4.6 Article

Effects of low AIPL1 expression on phototransduction in rods

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 47, Issue 5, Pages 2185-2194

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1341

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY010309, EY00871, EY12944, P30 EY012190, EY10309, EY12190, R01 EY004149, P30 EY014104, R01 EY012944, EY01844, EY014104, EY11522, EY04149, EY11358, R01 EY011358] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. To investigate the impact of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein-like (AIPL)-1 on photoreception in rods. METHODS. Photoresponses of mouse rods expressing lowered amounts of AIPL1 were studied by single-cell and electroretinogram ( ERG) recordings. Phototransduction protein levels and enzymatic activities were determined in biochemical assays. Ca2+ dynamics were probed with a fluorescent dye. Comparisons were made to rods expressing mutant Y99C guanylate cyclase activating protein (GCAP)-1, to understand which effects arose from elevated dark levels of cGMP and Ca2+. RESULTS. Except for PDE, transduction protein levels were normal in low-AIPL1 retinas, as were guanylate cyclase ( GC), rhodopsin kinase (RK), and normalized phosphodiesterase (PDE) activities. Y99C and low-AIPL1 rods were more sensitive to flashes than normal, but flash responses of low-AIPL1 rods showed an abnormal delay, reduced rate of increase, and longer recovery not present in Y99C rod responses. In addition, low-AIPL1 rods but not Y99C rods failed to reach the normal light-induced minimum in Ca2+ concentration. CONCLUSIONS. Reduced AIPL1 delayed the photoresponse, decreased its amplification constant, slowed a rate-limiting step in its recovery, and limited the light-induced decrease in Ca2+. Not all changes were attributable to decreased PDE or to elevated cGMP and Ca2+ in darkness. Therefore, AIPL1 directly or indirectly affects more than one component of phototransduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available