4.2 Article

Loss of heterozygosity at chromosome 6 as a marker of early genetic alterations in cervical intraepithelial neoplasias and microinvasive carcinomas

Journal

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 3, Pages 385-395

Publisher

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S0026893306030058

Keywords

chromosome 6; loss of heterozygosity; human papillomavirus; cervical cancer; CIN; tumor progression; genetic heterogeneity; policlonality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oncogenic human papillomaviruses (mostly HPV types 16 and 18) are the major cause of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), which progresses into cervical cancer (CC). To reveal early genetic alterations of chromosome 6 that are important for CC progression, we analyzed the loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in DNAs from 45 CIN cases, 47 microcarcinomas, and 19 invasive squamous cell carcinomas stage IB. LOH analysis of DNA samples prepared with microdissection from all CIN foci, as well as from CC lesions and synchronous CIN, permitted investigation of CIN and CC heterogeneity. Out of all CC stage I cases, 79% showed LOH with six microsatellite markers at chromosome 6. LOH with the microsatellite markers D6S276 (6p22) and TNFa (6p21.3) was found in 50% of the CC cases. LOH frequency in CIN lesions synchronous with CC was higher then in CIN cases without cancer; the statistical significance (P = 0.004) was shown for D6S291 (6p21.2). The finding suggests that the high frequency of LOH in CIN lesions is a marker of unfavorable prognosis for CIN. Progression from microcarcinoma to invasive CC of stage IB was associated with a higher LOH frequency at D6S344 (6p25) and TNFa (6p2l.3). Early genetic alterations were found in CIN with microsatelZ' lites D6S273 and TNFa located at 6p21.3. Moreover, LOH frequency at D6S273 remained the same in both CIN and CC cases. Based on HPV typing, LOH analysis, and X-chromosome inactivation, the polyclonality of CC lesions, as well as CIN, was observed in a few patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available