4.7 Article

Plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine concentrations are elevated in obese insulin-resistant women and fall with weight loss

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages 1896-1900

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2005-1441

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR2HLL406, RR 000070, RR16071-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [1R01HL73084-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine ( ADMA) concentrations are higher in apparently healthy, insulin-resistant (IR) individuals and decrease in response to thiazolidenedione treatment. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine whether ADMA concentrations would also fall when insulin sensitivity is enhanced with weight loss in obese individuals. Design/Setting/Patients/Intervention: Twenty obese women classified as IR or insulin sensitive ( IS) on the basis of their steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) concentration during the insulin suppression test underwent 12 wk of dietary weight loss. Outcome Measures: Plasma glucose, insulin, and ADMA were measured at baseline and after weight loss; change in insulin resistance was quantified by repeating the SSPG after the dietary intervention. Results: Although weight loss was similar in the two groups, significant improvements in SSPG, glucose, and insulin concentrations were confined to the IR group. Baseline plasma ADMA concentrations (mean +/- SD) were higher in IR subjects (1.69 +/- 0.44 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.45 mu mol/liter, P = 0.02) and decreased to 1.20 +/- 0.22 mu mol/liter (P < 0.001) with weight loss. In contrast, ADMA levels did not change with a similar extent of weight loss in the IS group. Conclusion: Plasma ADMA levels are higher in obese, IR women than in equally obese, IS women and decrease in response to weight loss when associated with enhancement of insulin sensitivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available