4.4 Article

Glioma test array for use with formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue - Array comparative genomic hybridization correlates with loss of heterozygosity and fluorescence in situ hybridization

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 268-276

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050109

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R33 CA106695, CA106695, R01 CA057683, CA57683, R21 CA106695] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [T32 NS048005, NS048005] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a powerful, high-throughput tool for whole genome analysis. Until recently, aCGH could only be reproducibly performed on frozen tissue samples and with significant tissue amounts. For brain tumors however, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from small stereotactic biopsies may be the only tissue routinely available. The development of methods to analyze formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) material therefore has the potential to impact molecular diagnosis in a significant way. To this end, we constructed a BAC array representing chromosomes 1, 7, 19, and X because 1p/19q deletion and EGFR gene amplification provide clinically relevant information for glioma diagnosis. We also optimized a two-step labeling procedure using an amine-modified nucleotide for generating aCGH probes. Using this approach, we analyzed a series of 28 FFPE oligodendroglial tumors for alterations of chromosomes 1, 7, and 19. We also independently assayed these tumors for 1p/19q deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization and by loss of heterozygosity analyses. The concordance between aCGH, standard loss of heterozygosity and fluorescence in situ hybridization was nearly 100% for the chromosomes analyzed. These results suggest that aCGH could offer an improved molecular diagnostic approach for gliomas because of its ability to detect clinically relevant molecular alterations in small FFPE specimens.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available