4.7 Article

Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT.: Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 1117-1123

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-0079-z

Keywords

computed tomography (CT); multislice spiral CT (MSCT); left ventricle; cardiac function; segmentation algorithm; automated segmentation; post-processing time; time-effectiveness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose was to evaluate a new semi-automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithm for functional analysis of the left ventricle in multislice CT (MSCT) of the heart. Twenty patients underwent contrast-enhanced MSCT of the heart (collimation 16x0.75 mm; 120 kV; 550 mAseff). Multiphase image reconstructions with 1-mm axial slices and 8-mm short-axis slices were performed. Left ventricular volume measurements (end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, ejection fraction and stroke volume) from manually drawn endocardial contours in the short axis slices were compared to semi-automated region-growing segmentation of the left ventricle from the 1-mm axial slices. The post-processing-time for both methods was recorded. Applying the new region-growing algorithm in 13/20 patients (65%), proper segmentation of the left ventricle was feasible. In these patients, the signal-to-noise ratio was higher than in the remaining patients (3.2 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.6). Volume measurements of both segmentation algorithms showed an excellent correlation (all <= 0.0001); the limits of agreement for the ejection fraction were 2.3 +/- 8.3 ml. In the patients with proper segmentation the mean post-processing time using the region-growing algorithm was diminished by 44.2%. On the basis of a good contrast-enhanced data set, a left ventricular volume analysis using the new semi-automated region-growing segmentation algorithm is technically feasible, accurate and more time-effective.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available