4.7 Article

Molecular epidemiology of urinary tract isolates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium from North America

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages 392-396

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.12.006

Keywords

Enterococcus faecium; vancomycin-resistant; pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; urinary tract

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) are a common cause of nosocomial infections and are important agents of gastrointestinal colonisation. As the prevalence of VRE in hospitalised patients continues to increase, implementation of appropriate infection control measures requires routine surveillance of VRE transmission patterns. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the molecular epidemiology of VRE isolates within the USA and Canada. Two hundred and eighty-three urinary tract isolates of VRE were collected in the year 2000 from ten Canadian hospitals and 28 US tertiary care medical centres representing seven of the nine geographic regions of the United States Bureau of the Census. The in vitro activity of vancomycin, teicoplanin and nine comparators was determined by broth microdilution. The genetic relatedness among isolates was evaluated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Resistance rates (intermediate and resistant) were 100% for vancomycin and 78.7% for teicoplanin. Resistance was lowest with linezolid, chloramphenicol and nitrofurantoin at 0.3%, 0.3% and 0.5%, respectively. PFGE revealed that genetic heterogeneity amongst isolates from each of the medical centres varied considerably. Despite some intracentre and intercentre VRE dissemination, the present study found no evidence for the emergence of a dominant clonal strain. This suggests that the spread of VRE within North America is a complex process involving both the horizontal transfer of glycopeptide resistance determinants and polyclonal dissemination. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available