4.2 Article

Oxygen isotope composition of annually banded modem and mid-Holocene travertine and evidence of paleomonsoon floods, Grand Canyon, Arizona, USA

Journal

QUATERNARY RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 366-379

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.yqres.2005.12.001

Keywords

travertine; Grand Canyon; oxygen isotopes; Holocene paleoclimate; monsoon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Holocene and modem travertine formed in spring-fed Havasu Creek of the Grand Canyon, Arizona, was studied to determine the factors governing its oxygen-isotope composition. Analysis of substrate-grown travertine indicates that calculated calcite-formation temperatures compare favorably with measured water temperatures, and include silt-rich laminae deposited by monsoon-driven floods. Ancient spring-pool travertine is dated by U-series at 7380 +/- 110 yr and consists of 14 travertine-silt couplets of probable annual deposition. One hundred eighty high-resolution delta O-18 analyses of this mid-Holocene sample average -11.0%. PDB. The average value for modem travertine is similar to 0.5 parts per thousand lower, perhaps because mid-Holocene temperature was higher or there was proportionally greater summer recharge. delta O-18 cyclicity in the mid-Holocene travertine has average amplitude of 1.9 +/- 0.5 parts per thousand PDB, slightly less than the inferred modem-day annual temperature range of Havasu Creek. The annual temperature range might have been reduced during the 14-yr interval compared to present, although other non-temperature factors could account for the muted annual variation. Silt-rich laminae within isotopically lower calcite in the modem and mid-Holocene travertine verifies the seasonal resolution of both samples, and suggests that similar temperature-precipitation conditions, as well as monsoon-generated summer floods, prevailed in the mid-Holocene as they do throughout the Grand Canyon region today. (c) 2006 University of Washington. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available