4.7 Article

Effects of weight training on quality of life in recent breast cancer survivors - The Weight Training for Breast Cancer Survivors (WTBS) Study

Journal

CANCER
Volume 106, Issue 9, Pages 2076-2083

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21829

Keywords

breast neoplasms; cancer survivors; exercise; psychological factor; quality of life; weight training

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [T32 CA09607-15, P30 CA77398] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR00400] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Aerobic exercise training has been shown to have beneficial effects oil quality of life (QOL) in breast cancer survivors. However, the effects of weight training on psychological benefits are unknown. We Sought to examine the effects of weight training on changes in QOL and depressive symptoms in recent breast cancer Survivors. METHODS: A convenience sample of 86 Survivors (4-36 months posttreatment) was randomized into treatment and control groups. The primary outcomes were 2 changes in QOL (CARES short form) and depressive symptoms (CES-D) between baseline and month 6 in this randomized controlled trial. RESULTS: Over 6 months the physical global QOL score improved in the treatment 3 group compared with the control group (Standardized Difference = 0.62, P = .006). The psychosocial global score also improved significantly in the treatment group compared with the control group (Standardized Difference = 0.52, P = .02). There were no changes in CES-D scores. Increases in upper body strength were correlated with improvements in physical global score (r = 0.32; P < .01) and psychosocial global score (r = 0.30; P < .01). Increases in lean mass were also correlated with improvements in physical global score (r = 0.23; P < .05) and psychosocial global score (r = 0.24; P < .05). CONCLUSION: Twice-weekly weight training for recent breast cancer survivors may result in improved QOL, in part via changes in body composition and strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available