4.2 Article

Estimating costs of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic colorectal cancer

Journal

CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 52-58

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.3816/CCC.2006.n.021

Keywords

case-control design; health-care costs; oncology; retrospective data

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: This study examines the resource use patterns and costs of care for patients with incident metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) based on analyses of retrospective claims data from selected health plans in the United States. Patients and Methods: A case-control analysis was performed using claims from years 1998-2004. Incident mCRC cases were identified based on evidence of a colorectal cancer diagnosis and a metastatic disease diagnosis. Incident mCRC cases could have no other evidence of cancer in the I-year period before the date of their first mCRC diagnosis. Cases were matched to non-mCRC controls based on age, sex, geographic region, and duration of plan enrollment. Costs were evaluated by phase of disease: diagnosis, treatment, or death phases. Ordinary least squares regressions were performed to evaluate impact of covariates in each phase. Results: Total costs in the follow-up period averaged $97,031 more for mCRC cases than for controls. The main cost drivers for mCRC were hospitalizations ($37,369) and specialist visits ($34,582), which included chemotherapy administration. Approximately 40% of the 672 patients with mCRC who qualified for the phase analysis were identified with a fatal event during follow-up. Monthly costs were similar in the diagnostic phase ($12,205) and death phase ($12,328), but were significantly lower in the treatment phase ($4722). Both mean/median monthly costs increased over time during the study period, regardless of disease phase. Conclusion: The economic burden of mCRC is substantial for patients with commercial health plans in the United States, and costs of care have increased substantially in recent years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available