4.1 Article

The determination of brick provenance and technology using analytical techniques from the physical sciences

Journal

ARCHAEOMETRY
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 201-218

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00251.x

Keywords

brick; technology; provenance; Dublin; petrographic microscopy; SEM-EDX; XRD; mortar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work applies established analytical techniques from the physical sciences to Irish brick, in order to gather evidence of ceramic technologies, provenance and sources of raw materials. Petrographic microscopy, X-ray diffractometry and scanning electron microscopy with an energy-dispersive X-ray diffraction attachment were used to study the brick of Rathfarham Castle, Dublin, built c. 1618, where clay brick was introduced in 1771. Local clay was fired in the laboratory and analysed in a similar manner. The petrography of the pointing mortar was studied in order to gather evidence of ceramic provenance. This paper concludes that the brick was hand- moulded with a silica-based, predominantly non-calcareous clay of glacial origin, gathered locally, including fluxes and a high percentage of non-plastic material. The mineralogy and petrography of the brick, together with the presence of pebbles and a coarse matrix, suggest that the raw clay was probably gathered from a glacial deposit. The presence of abundant pebbles and colour inhomogeneities suggests a lack of processing of the raw clay. The brick was probably fired in clamps at top firing temperatures ranging from 750 degrees C to above 900 degrees C. Transformation of limestone temper involving the breakdown of calcite and the generation of calcium silicates, and the new formation of plagioclase, high-temperature quartz, hematite and spinel were revealed. The presence of spinel in 'hot spots' indicates that fuel was added to the raw clay in order to assist firing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available