4.4 Article

WrbA from Escherichia coli and Archaeoglobus fulgidus is an NAD(P)H:Quinone oxidoreductase

Journal

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
Volume 188, Issue 10, Pages 3498-3506

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.188.10.3498-3506.2006

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

WrbA (tryptophan [W] repressor-binding protein) was discovered in Escherichia coli, where it was proposed to play a role in regulation of the tryptophan operon; however, this has been put in question, leaving the function unknown. Here we report a phylogenetic analysis of 30 sequences which indicated that WrbA is the prototype of a distinct family of flavoproteins which exists in a diversity of cell types across all three domains of life and includes documented NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductases (NQOs) from the Fungi and Viridiplantae kingdoms. Biochemical characterization of the prototypic WrbA protein from E. coli and WrbA from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, a hyperthermophilic species from the Archaea domain, shows that these enzymes have NQO activity, suggesting that this activity is a defining characteristic of the WrbA family that we designate a new type of NQO (type IV). For E. coli WrbA, the K-m(NADH) was 14 +/- 0.43 mu M and the K-m(benzoquinone) was 5.8 +/- 0.12 mu M. For A. fulgidus WrbA, the K-m(NADH) was 19 +/- 1.7 mu M and the K-m(benzoquinone) was 37 +/- 3.6 mu M. Both enzymes were found to be homodimeric by gel filtration chromatography and homotetrameric by dynamic light scattering and to contain one flavin mononucleotide molecule per monomer. The NQO activity of each enzyme is retained over a broad pH range, and apparent initial velocities indicate that maximal activities are comparable to the optimum growth temperature for the respective organisms. The results are discussed and implicate WrbA in the two-electron reduction of quinones, protecting against oxidative stress.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available