4.7 Article

Adiponectin genetic variability, plasma adiponectin, and cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 55, Issue 5, Pages 1512-1516

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db05-1520

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 87969] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 34594, HL 71981, HL 65582] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 58845, P30 DK040561-11, P30 DK040561] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adiponectin is an adipocyte-derived hormone that has shown anti-inflammatory and antiatherogenic effects. We assessed the associations of variants in the adiponectin gene (ADIPOQ) with circulating adiponectin levels and cardiovascular risk among women with type 2 diabetes. Of 989 diabetic women from the Nurses' Health Study, 285 developed cardiovascular disease (CVD) during follow-up through 2000. We genotyped five ADIPOQ polymorphisms in the CVD case and control subjects. A promoter polymorphism - 11365C -> G was significantly associated with lower plasma adiponectin levels (P = 0.004). The homozygotes of allele -4034C were significantly associated with similar to 60% increased cardiovascular risk (odds ratio 1.62 [95% CI 1.07-2.45]). Adjustment for age, BMI, and other covariates did not appreciably change the associations. In addition, a common haplotype possessing allele +276T (CAATT) was associated with a significantly lower CVD risk than the most common haplotype (CAATG) (0.70 [0.50-0.98]). In our meta-analysis of 827 CVD case and 1,887 CVD-free control subjects, polymorphism +276G -> T was significantly associated with similar to 45% (20-62%) decreased CVD risk under a recessive inheritance mode in diabetic patients. In conclusion, ADIPOQ promoter polymorphism -11365C -> G was associated with plasma adiponectin levels, whereas polymorphisms -4034A -> C and +276G -> T were associated with CVD risk in diabetic patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available