4.4 Review

TAGE (toxic AGEs) theory in diabetic complications

Journal

CURRENT MOLECULAR MEDICINE
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages 351-358

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/156652406776894536

Keywords

advanced glycation end-products (AGES); glyceraldehyde-derived AGES (AGE-2); toxic AGES (TAGE); receptor for AGEs (RAGE); diabetic complications; retinopathy; nephropathy; neuropathy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diabetic complication is a leading cause of acquired blindness, end-stage renal failure, a variety of neuropathies and accelerated atherosclerosis. Chronic hyperglycemia is initially involved in the pathogenesis of diabetic micro- and macro-vascular complications via various metabolic derangements. High glucose increased production of various types of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). Recently, we found that glyceralclehyde-derived AGEs (AGE-2) play an important role in the pathogenesis of angiopathy in diabetic patients. There is considerable interest in receptor for AGEs (RAGE) found on many cell types, particularly those affected in diabetes. Recent studies suggest that interaction of AGE-2 (predominantly structure of toxic AGEs; TAGE) with RAGE alters intracellular signaling, gene expression, release of pro-inflamatory molecules and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that contribute towards the pathology of diabetic complications. We propose three pathways for the in vivo formation of AGE-2 precursor, glyceraldehyde, such as i) glycolytic pathway, ii) polyol pathway, and iii) fructose metabolic pathway. Glyceraldehyde can be transported or can leak passively across the plasma membrane. It can react non-enzymatically with proteins to lead to accelerated formation of TAGE at both intracellularly and extracellularly. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of diabetic complications, especially focusing on toxic AGEs (TAGE) and their receptor (RAGE) system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available