4.7 Article

Retention of aroma compounds in food matrices of similar rheological behaviour and different compositions

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 104-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.014

Keywords

retention; release; aroma compounds; carbohydrate matrix; lipid; partition coefficient; kinetic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two matrices with a similar rheological behaviour but with a different composition have been developed: one containing carbohydrates (D-glucose, pectin and starch) and in the second one, called complex matrix, a lipid (triolein) was added. The release of six aroma compounds is quantified by using the measurements of partition coefficients at thermodynamic equilibrium. The role of lipid (triolein) on the retention of all the aroma compounds was pointed out. The effect of carbohydrates was more complex: in comparison with water, ethyl hexanoate and trans-2-hexenal were more retained whereas diacetyl, 2-pentanone and cis-3-hexenol were repulsed from the matrix. The kinetic study of the release from these matrices had shown a decrease of the initial rate of release by reference with water. From carbohydrates matrix, the decrease of the release for three compounds (ethyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, 2-pentanone) seemed to arise from the variation of diffusion and/or retention by carbohydrates. For the three other aroma compounds (diacetyl, cis-3-hexenol and trans-2-hexenal) no variation of the initial rate was registered. The comparison of the release rates from carbohydrate and complex matrices indicated the role of lipids and the comparison of the release rates from water and complex matrix showed the combined effects of texture and lipids. The decrease of initial release rate was more important in presence of lipids than in presence of carbohydrates. The most important decrease was observed with the most hydrophobic compound. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available