4.4 Article

Dissociating uncertainty responses and reinforcement signals in the comparative study of uncertainty monitoring

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages 282-297

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.282

Keywords

uncertainty monitoring; metacognition; deferred feedback; monkeys; Macaca mulatta

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD-38051] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although researchers are exploring animals' capacity for monitoring their states of uncertainty, the use of some paradigms allows the criticism that animals map avoidance responses to error-causing stimuli not because of uncertainty monitored but because of feedback signals and stimulus aversion. The authors addressed this criticism with an uncertainty-monitoring task in which participants completed blocks of trials with feedback deferred so that they could not associate reinforcement signals to particular stimuli or stimulus-response pairs. Humans and 1 of 2 monkeys were able to make cognitive, decisional uncertainty responses that were independent of feedback or reinforcement history within a task. This finding unifies the comparative literature on uncertainty monitoring. The dissociation of performance from reinforcement has theoretical implications, and the deferred-feedback technique has many applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available