4.7 Article

Intramyocellular lipid quantification from 1H long echo time spectra at 1.5 and 3 T by means of the LCModel technique

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 728-735

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20574

Keywords

H-1 MR spectroscopy; intramyocellular lipids; calf muscle; LCModel; insulin resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To introduce a method of independent determination of CH2 and CH3 components of intramyocellular lipids (IMCLs) by using long TE for spectra measurement and LCModel for spectra evaluation, to test this technique in controls and insulin- resistant subjects, and to compare results at 1.5 and 3 T. Materials and Methods: Eight healthy volunteers and 11 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus under-went measurement using a 1.5-T MR scanner; six healthy volunteers were measured using a 3-T MR scanner. Spectra from the tibialis anterior muscle were acquired by using a point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence with the following parameters: TR/TE/ACQ = 2000 msec/270 msec/256. Spectra were processed by LCModel 6.1 software with two types of adopted basis-set. Results: Spectra with good separation of both CH2 and CH3 components of IMCL and extramyocellular lipids (EMCLs) were obtained and the LCModel routine was successfully applied. The reproducibility comparison (N = 7 at 1.5 T vs. N = 5 at 3T) showed that better results can be obtained at higher B-0 values. The comparison of the healthy and insulin-resistant subjects proved that both IMCL_CH2/Cr and IMCL_CH3/Cr ratios significantly differ. Conclusion: Long TE spectroscopy of the human muscle with IMCL quantification using the LCModel technique can detect changes in IMCL levels as well as help in the study of fatty acyl chain composition. Using a higher field strength increased the intra-individual reproducibility by approximately 150%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available