4.6 Article

Region-specific dissociation of neuronal loss and neurofibrillary pathology in a mouse model of tauopathy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 168, Issue 5, Pages 1598-1607

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050840

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG00277, R01 AG026249, R01 AG008487, AG26249, AG08487, P50 AG005134, T32 AG000277] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurofibrillary tangles form in a specific spatial and temporal pattern in Alzheimer's disease. Although tangle formation correlates with dementia and neuronal loss, it remains unknown whether neurofibrillary pathology causes cell death. Recently, a mouse model of tauopathy was developed that reversibly expresses human tan with the dementia-associated P301L mutation. This model (rTg4510) exhibits progressive behavioral deficits that are ameliorated with transgene suppression. Using quantitative analysis of PHF1 immunostaining and neuronal counts, we estimated neuron number and accumulation of neurofibrillary pathology in five brain regions. Accumulation of PHF1-positive tan in neurons appeared between 2.5 and 7 months of age in a region-specific manner and increased with age. Neuron loss was dramatic and region-specific in these mice, reaching over 80% loss in hippocampal area CA1 and dentate gyrus by 8.5 months. We observed regional dissociation of neuronal loss and accumulation of neurofibrillary pathology, because there was loss of neurons before neurofibrillary lesions appeared in the dentate gyros and, conversely, neurofibrillary pathology appeared without major cell loss in the striatum. Finally, suppressing the transgene prevented further neuronal loss without removing or preventing additional accumulation of neurofibrillary pathology. Together, these results imply that neurofibrillary tangles do not necessarily lead to neuronal death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available