4.7 Article

Mid-infrared Spitzer spectra of X-ray-selected Type 2 QSOs:: QSO2s are not ultraluminous infrared galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 642, Issue 1, Pages 81-86

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/500828

Keywords

galaxies : active; galaxies : evolution; quasars : general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have performed a spectroscopic study of seven Type 2 QSOs using the mid-infrared spectrometer IRS on board the Spitzer Space Telescope. These are (to our knowledge) the first mid-IR spectra of X-ray-selected QSO2s taken. The objects have been selected according to their high intrinsic luminosities and column densities in X-rays. Their spectra strongly differ from template spectra of Type 2 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) at lower luminosities. They do not exhibit strong PAH dust emission features from circumnuclear star-forming regions, typical for lower luminosity Type 2 Seyfert galaxies or other previously used QSO2 templates, such as the (ultra) luminous infrared galaxy ([U]LIRG) NGC 6240. They also do not show the ice and silicate absorption features of highly luminous but deeply embedded compact nuclei seen in some ULIRGs. Instead, they reveal a relatively featureless, rising continuum similar to luminous Type 1 AGNs. We also find evidence for a 10 mu m silicate feature in emission. Models of dusty tori in the AGN unification scenario predict this only for Type 1 AGNs. The ratio of the AGN continuum luminosity at 6 mu m to the absorption-corrected 2 - 10 keV X-ray AGN luminosity is very similar to that found in Seyfert galaxies. X-ray - selected QSO2s are thus characterized by powerful AGNs in hosts with a luminosity due to star formation <= 10(11) L-circle dot. The dominance of the AGN light in themid-IR spectra of QSO2s together with their flatter spectral energy distributions (SEDs) places important constraints on models of the cosmic infrared background and of the star formation history of the universe.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available