4.7 Article

Involvement of selenoprotein P in protection of human astrocytes from oxidative damage

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 40, Issue 9, Pages 1513-1523

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.12.022

Keywords

selenoprotein P; astrocyte; oxidative stress; selenium; cGPx; free radical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selenoprotein P (SeP) is a highly glycosylated, selenium-rich plasma protein. Aside from its role as selenium carrier protein, an antioxidative function of SeP has been Suggested. Astrocytes, which detoxify reactive oxygen species in the brain, were described as potential target cells of SeP. We investigated the expression of SeP in human astrocytes and its involvement in the protection of these cells against tert-butyl hydroperoxide (t-BHP)-induced oxidative damage. We show that primary human astrocytes and the human astrocytoma cell line MOG-G-CCM express SeP as an unglycosylated protein, which is not secreted. SeP expression in astrocytes is constitutive. Preincubation of astrocytes with bepatocyte-derived SeP mimicks the protective effect of low-molecular-weight selenocompounds such as sodium selenite or selenomethionine against oxidative damage, shielding astrocytes from t-BHP-induced cytotoxicity. Selenium supplementation of astrocytes counteracts oxidative stress via an increase in expression and activity of the selenoenzyme cytosolic glutathione peroxidase (cGPx). Furthermore, specific downregulation of SeP expression by small interfering RNA decreases cell viability of human astrocytes and makes them more Susceptible to t-BHP-induced cytotoxicity. Our results implicate an antioxidant activity of constitutively expressed SeP in selenium-deficient astrocytes, while during adequate selenium supply the enhanced protection against oxidative stress is exerted by cGPx. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available