4.7 Article

Expression of ethylene-related expansin genes in cool-stored ripening banana fruit

Journal

PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 170, Issue 5, Pages 962-967

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.01.001

Keywords

banana; chilling injury; ethylene; expansin; low temperature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expansins are cellular proteins expressed in the course of cell wall loosening during fruit ripening. There is no information about the relationship between expansins and ripening of chilling injury (CI)-affected banana fruit. Banana fruit were pre-treated with 0 or 1000 mu L/L propylene (functional ethylene analogue) for 16 h and then stored at 7 degrees C. Cl symptoms of untreated control fruit appeared after 4 days, while propylene pre-treated fruit showed CI symptoms after 7 days. Thus, stimulation of ripening with propylene applied prior to storage at low temperature tended to alleviate Cl. The fruit were stored for 8 days at 7 degrees C and then transferred to 22 degrees C, followed by treatment with 1000 mu L/L propylene to initiate ripening. The propylene treatment accelerated color change, increased ethylene production rate and caused a more rapid decrease in peel and pulp firmness. Two banana expansins, AY083168 and AF539540 (GeneBank), were chosen as the target genes MaExp1 and MaExp2, respectively. RNA blotting analysis showed no accumulation of either MaExp1 or MaExp2 transcripts in banana fruit during low temperature storage. Expansin genes were expressed more intensively in propylene pre-treated fruit than in control fruit upon removal from cold storage for propylene-initiated ripening. The results suggest that increased tolerance of banana fruit pre-treated with propylene to low temperature-induced chilling was related to higher post-storage ethylene production rates and enhanced expression of MaExp1 and MaExp2. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available