4.7 Article

Imported Katayama fever: Clinical and biological features at presentation and during treatment

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 339-345

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.07.022

Keywords

Katayama; schistosomiasis; eosinophilia; praziquantel; traveller; Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To investigate the characteristics of imported Katayama fever (acute schistosomiasis) as well as evolution and outcome under treatment. Methods: Between April 2000 and September 2004, we included prospectively all patients with confirmed diagnosis of Katayama fever. Follow-up was maintained at least until 6 months after symptoms resolved. Praziquantel. (PZQ) was given as soon as the diagnosis was probable, most of the time with steroids. Results: Twenty-three patients were diagnosed with Katayama fever by Schistosoma egg detection and/or by seroconversion. Clinical features were non-specific, with mainly respiratory and/or gastrointestinal symptoms. Diagnosis was confirmed at presentation in 17/23 (74%) patients, of whom 15 by serology. Immediate clinical exacerbation occurred in five of nine patients not given steroids concomitantly with PZQ. After initial resolution, fever recurred in five (22%) patients. When compiling initial and recurrent episodes (n=28), respiratory symptoms tended to occur at an earlier stage after exposure, white abdominal complaints were more frequent later. All patients were completely cured, sometimes after repeated treatments. Conclusions: Clinical presentation of Katayama fever is non-specific and involves respiratory and abdominal symptoms. Recurrence of fever is not unusual despite anti-helminthic treatment. Optimal therapeutic strategy remains to be defined to prevent recurrence. (c) 2005 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available