4.6 Article

Q-learning and policy iteration algorithms for stochastic shortest path problems

Journal

ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH
Volume 208, Issue 1, Pages 95-132

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1128-z

Keywords

Markov decision processes; Q-learning; Approximate dynamic programming; Value iteration; Policy iteration; Stochastic shortest paths; Stochastic approximation

Funding

  1. Air Force Grant [FA9550-10-1-0412]
  2. NSF [ECCS-0801549]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We consider the stochastic shortest path problem, a classical finite-state Markovian decision problem with a termination state, and we propose new convergent Q-learning algorithms that combine elements of policy iteration and classical Q-learning/value iteration. These algorithms are related to the ones introduced by the authors for discounted problems in Bertsekas and Yu (Math. Oper. Res. 37(1):66-94, 2012). The main difference from the standard policy iteration approach is in the policy evaluation phase: instead of solving a linear system of equations, our algorithm solves an optimal stopping problem inexactly with a finite number of value iterations. The main advantage over the standard Q-learning approach is lower overhead: most iterations do not require a minimization over all controls, in the spirit of modified policy iteration. We prove the convergence of asynchronous deterministic and stochastic lookup table implementations of our method for undiscounted, total cost stochastic shortest path problems. These implementations overcome some of the traditional convergence difficulties of asynchronous modified policy iteration, and provide policy iteration-like alternative Q-learning schemes with as reliable convergence as classical Q-learning. We also discuss methods that use basis function approximations of Q-factors and we give an associated error bound.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available