4.8 Article

Lung dysfunction causes systemic hypoxia in estrogen receptor β knockout (ERβ-/-) mice

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602194103

Keywords

extracellular matrix; caveolin; metalloproteinase; hypertension; lung fibrosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Estrogen receptor beta (ER beta) is highly expressed in both type I and II pneumocytes as well as bronchiolar epithelial cells. ER alpha is not detectable in the adult lung. Lungs of adult female ER beta knockout (ER beta(-/-)) mice have already been reported to have fewer alveoli and reduced elastic recoil. In this article, we report that, by 5 months of age, there are large areas of unexpanded alveoli in lungs of both male and female ER beta(-/-) mice. There is increased staining for collagen and, by EM, abnormal clusters of collagen fibers are seen in the alveolar septa of ER beta(-/-) mice. Immunohistochemical analysis and Western blotting with lung membrane fractions of ER beta(-/-) mice revealed down-regulation of caveolin-1, increased expression of membrane type-1 metalloproteinase, matrix metalloproteinase 2 (active form), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 2. Hypoxia, measured by immunohistochemical analysis for hypoxia-inclucible factor 1 alpha and chemical adducts (with Hypoxyprobe), was evident in the heart, ventral prostate, periovarian sac, kidney, liver, and brain of ER beta(-/-) mice under resting conditions. Furthermore, both male and female adult ER beta(-/-) mice were reluctant to run on a treadmill and tissue hypoxia became very pronounced after exercise. We conclude that ER beta is necessary for the maintenance of the extracellular matrix composition in the lung and loss of ER beta leads to abnormal lung structure and systemic hypoxia. Systemic hypoxia may be responsible for the reported left and right heart ventricular hypertrophy and systemic hypertension in ER beta(-/-) mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available