4.7 Article

Insect nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: Neonicotinoid binding site specificity is usually but not always conserved with varied substituents and species

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 54, Issue 9, Pages 3365-3371

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf0601517

Keywords

acetamiprid; dinotefuran; Drosophila; Homalodisca; imidacloprid; neonicotinoids; nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Funding

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01 ES08424] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The diversity of neonicotinoid insecticides acting as insect nicotinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptor (nAChR) agonists is illustrated by imidacloprid (IMI) with chloropyridinylmethyl (CPM) and N-nitroimine substituents, dinotefuran (DIN) with tetrahydrofurylmethyl (TFM) and N-nitroimine moieties, and acetamiprid (ACE) with CPM and N-cyanoimine groups. These three neonicotinoids are used here as radioligands to test the hypothesis that they all bind to the same site in the same way in both fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) and a leafhopper pest (Homalodisca coagulata): that is, neonicotinoid binding site specificity is conserved in the insect nAChRs. Multiple approaches show that [3H] IMI and [3H] ACE interact with an identical site in both species. However, although [3H] DIN binds with high affinity in both insects, its pharmacological profile in Homalodisca is surprisingly unique, with high sensitivity to some TFM-containing compounds and ACh. The TFM moiety of DIN may bind in a different orientation compared to the CPM group of IMI and ACE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available