4.6 Article

Studies of the inner reorganization energies of the cation radicals of 1,4-bis(dimethylamino)benzene, 9,10-bis(dimethylamino)anthracene, and 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene by photoelectron spectroscopy and reinterpretation of the mechanism of the electrochemical oxidation of the parent diamines

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
Volume 110, Issue 17, Pages 5650-5655

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jp060453b

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inner reorganization energy of the cation radical of 1,4-bis(dimethylamino) benzene, 1, has been determined to be 0.72 +/- 0.02 eV by means of gas-phase photoelectron spectroscopy ( PES). PES studies of 9,10-bis-(dimethylamino)anthracene, 2, and 3,6-bis(dimethylamino)durene, 3, demonstrate that their reorganization energies are smaller than that of 1. The effect of lowering the inner reorganization energy on the rate constant for an electrochemical electron-transfer reaction is to increase the electron-transfer rate constant, k(s). However, voltammetric studies of the two-electron oxidation of 2 and 3 indicate that the values of k(s) for each step are smaller than those for 1, in contradistinction to the measured differences in reorganization energies. The voltammetric studies of 2 and 3 were reinterpreted according to a mechanism in which each step of oxidation was written as a two-step process, electron transfer with a small inner reorganization energy plus a chemical step of structural change. The agreement of simulations according to this mechanism with the experimental data was excellent. The new reaction scheme eliminated some suspicious features previously obtained with an analysis where electron transfer and structural change were considered to be concerted. In particular, all electron-transfer coefficients (alpha) were close to one-half, whereas the earlier treatment produced values of alpha much larger or smaller than one-half.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available