4.0 Article

Unopposed estrogen therapy and the risk of invasive breast cancer

Journal

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 166, Issue 9, Pages 1027-1032

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.9.1027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 87969] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although short-term unopposed estrogen use does not seem to increase breast cancer risk, the effect of longer-term estrogen use remains unclear. We sought to assess the relationship between longer-term use of unopposed estrogen and the risk of invasive breast cancer over an extended follow-up period. Methods: Within the Nurses' Health Study, a prospective cohort study, we observed 11 508 postmenopausal women who had a hysterectomy and reported information on estrogen use at baseline ( 1980). The study population was expanded every 2 years to include women who subsequently became postmenopausal and had a hysterectomy, so that 28 835 women were included in the final follow-up period (2000-2002). Estrogen use was assessed from self-reported data on biennial questionnaires. The main outcome was invasive breast cancer. Results: A total of 934 invasive breast cancers were included in the analysis. Breast cancer risk increased with duration of unopposed estrogen use among longer-term users with the highest risk seen in cancers positive for estrogen receptor ( ER+) and progesterone receptor ( PR+). The multivariate relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer with current use of unopposed estrogen for less than 5 years, 5 to 9.9 years, 10 to 14.9 years, 15 to 19.9 years, and 20 years or longer were, respectively, 0.96 ( 95% CI, 0.75-1.22), 0.90 ( 95% CI, 0.73-1.12), 1.06 ( 95% CI, 0.87-1.30), 1.18 ( 95% CI, 0.95-1.48), and 1.42 ( 95% CI, 1.13-1.77) ( P for trend < .001). The risk of ER+/PR+ breast cancers was noted to be statistically significant after 15 years of current use (RR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05-2.07). Conclusion: Users of unopposed estrogen were at increased risk of breast cancer but only after longer-term use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available