4.7 Article

Structure of the Sulfolobus solfataricus α-glucosidase:: Implications for domain conservation and substrate recognition in GH31

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 358, Issue 4, Pages 1106-1124

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.02.056

Keywords

glycoside hydrolase; substrate specificity; alpha-glucosidase; alpha-xylosidase; crystal structure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystal structure of alpha-glucosidase MalA from Sulfolobus solfataricus has been determined at 2.5 angstrom resolution. It provides a structural model for enzymes representing the major specificity in glycoside hydrolase family 31 (GH31), including alpha-glucosidases from higher organisms, involved in glycogen degradation and glycoprotein processing. The structure of MalA shows clear differences from the only other structure known from GH31, alpha-xylosidase YicI. MalA and YicI share only 23% sequence identity. Although the two enzymes display a similar domain structure and both form hexamers, their structures differ significantly in quaternary organization: MalA is a dimer of trimers, YicI a trimer of dimers. MalA and YicI also differ in their substrate specificities, as shown by kinetic measurements on model chromogenic substrates. hi addition, MalA has a clear preference for maltose (Glc-alpha 1,4-Glc), whereas YicI prefers isoprimeverose (Xyl-alpha 1,6-Glc). The structural origin of this difference occurs in the -1 subsite where MalA residues Asp251 and Trp284 could interact with OH6 of the substrate. The structure of MalA in complex with beta-octyl-glucopyranoside has been determined. It reveals Arg400, Asp87, Trp284, Met321 and Phe327 as invariant residues forming the +1 subsite in the GH31 alpha-glucosidases. Structural comparisons with other GH families suggest that the GH31 enzymes belong to clan GH-D. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available