4.7 Article

Plasma circulating tumor DNA as an alternative to metastatic biopsies for mutational analysis in breast cancer

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 1959-1965

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu288

Keywords

breast cancer; circulating tumor DNA; targeted gene sequencing; liquid biopsy

Categories

Funding

  1. Fonds de la recherche scientifique (FNRS), from Breast Cancer Research Foundation (BCRF)
  2. MEDIC Foundation
  3. OncoDNA
  4. 'Les Amis de l'Institut Bordet'
  5. FNRS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Molecular screening programs use next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cancer gene panels to analyze metastatic biopsies. We interrogated whether plasma could be used as an alternative to metastatic biopsies. Patients and methods: The Ion AmpliSeq (TM) Cancer Hotspot Panel v2 (Ion Torrent), covering 2800 COSMIC mutations from 50 cancer genes was used to analyze 69 tumor (primary/metastases) and 31 plasma samples from 17 metastatic breast cancer patients. The targeted coverage for tumor DNA was x1000 and for plasma cell-free DNA x25 000. Whole blood normal DNAwas used to exclude germline variants. The Illumina technology was used to confirm observed mutations. Results: Evaluable NGS results were obtained for 60 tumor and 31 plasma samples from 17 patients. When tumor samples were analyzed, 12 of 17 (71%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 44% to 90%) patients had >= 1 mutation (median 1 mutation per patient, range 0-2 mutations) in either p53, PIK3CA, PTEN, AKT1 or IDH2 gene. When plasma samples were analyzed, 12 of 17 (71%, 95% CI: 44-90%) patients had = 1 mutation (median 1 mutation per patient, range 0-2 mutations) in either p53, PIK3CA, PTEN, AKT1, IDH2 and SMAD4. All mutations were confirmed. When we focused on tumor and plasma samples collected at the same time-point, we observed that, in four patients, no mutation was identified in either tumor or plasma; in nine patients, the same mutations was identified in tumor and plasma; in two patients, a mutation was identified in tumor but not in plasma; in two patients, a mutation was identified in plasma but not in tumor. Thus, in 13 of 17 (76%, 95% CI 50% to 93%) patients, tumor and plasma provided concordant results whereas in 4 of 17 (24%, 95% CI 7% to 50%) patients, the results were discordant, providing complementary information. Conclusion: Plasma can be prospectively tested as an alternative to metastatic biopsies in molecular screening programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available