4.7 Article

Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) with or without cilengitide in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of the randomized phase I/II ADVANTAGE trial (phase II part)

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 682-688

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu003

Keywords

cetuximab; cilengitide; integrin inhibitor; phase I/II; platinum-based chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil; recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M-SCCHN)

Categories

Funding

  1. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M-SCCHN) over-expresses alpha v beta 5 integrin. Cilengitide selectively inhibits alpha v beta 3 and alpha v beta 5 integrins and is investigated as a treatment strategy. Patients and methods: The phase I/II study ADVANTAGE evaluated cilengitide combined with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) in R/M-SCCHN. The phase II part reported here was an open-label, randomized, controlled trial investigating progression-free survival (PFS). Patients received up to six cycles of PFE alone or combined with cilengitide 2000 mg once (CIL1W) or twice (CIL2W) weekly. Thereafter, patients received maintenance therapy (cilengitide arms: cilengitide plus cetuximab; PFE-alone arm: cetuximab only) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: One hundred and eighty-two patients were treated. Median PFS per investigator read was similar for CIL1W + PFE, CIL2W + PFE, and PFE alone (6.4, 5.6, and 5.7 months, respectively). Accordingly, median overall survival and objective response rates were not improved with cilengitide (12.4 months/47%, 10.6 months/27%, and 11.6 months/36%, respectively). No clinically meaningful safety differences were observed between groups. None of the tested biomarkers (expression of integrins, CD31, Ki-67, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, vascular endothelial-cadherin, type IV collagen, epidermal growth factor receptor, or p16 for human papillomavirus) were predictive of outcome. Conclusion: Neither of the cilengitide-containing regimens demonstrated a PFS benefit over PFE alone in R/M-SCCHN patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available