4.5 Article

Insulin degrading enzyme is localized predominantly at the cell surface of polarized and unpolarized human cerebrovascular endothelial cell cultures

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 83, Issue 7, Pages 1262-1270

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.20809

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; cerebrovascular amyloid angiopathy; insulin; peptidase

Categories

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P30-AG13846] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Insulin degrading enzyme (IDE) is expressed in the brain and may play an important role there in the degradation of the amyloid beta peptide (A beta). Our results show that cultured human cerebrovascular endothelial cells (HCECs), a primary component of the blood-brain barrier, express IDE and may respond to exposure to low levels of A beta by upregulating its expression. When radiolabeled A beta is introduced to the medium of cultured HCECs, it is rapidly degraded to smaller fragments. We believe that this degradation is largely the result of the action of IDES as it can be substantially blocked by the presence of insulin in the medium, a competitive substrate of IDE. No inhibition is seen when an inhibitor of neprilysin, another protease that may degrade A beta, is present in the medium. Our evidence suggests that the action of IDE occurs outside the cell, as inhibitors of internalization fail to affect the rate of the observed degradation. Further, our evidence suggests that degradation by IDE occurs on the plasma membrane, as much of the IDE present in HCECs was biotin-labeled by a plasma membrane impermeable reagent. This activity seems to be polarity dependent, as measurement of A beta degradation by each surface of differentiated HCECs shows greater degradation on the basolateral (brain-facing) surface. Thus, IDE could be an important therapeutic target to decrease the amount of A beta in the cerebrovasculature. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available