4.7 Article

Cortical inefficiency in patients with unipolar depression:: An event-related MRI study with the Stroop task

Journal

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 59, Issue 10, Pages 958-965

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.025

Keywords

major depressive disorder; Stroop task; cognitive inhibition; functional magnetic resonance imaging; anterior cingulated; prefrontal cortex

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The present study is aimed to examine the neuronal correlates of Stroop interference in medication-free patients with major depressive disorder. Methods: Sixteen patients fulfilling Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for unipolar depression and 16 healthy control subjects matched for age, gender, and education were included. All subjects underwent an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) design with an adapted version of the Stroop task including congruent and incongruent task conditions. The fMRI experiment was conducted on a 1.5 T magnetic resonance (MR) scanner, and item responses were given manually by the subjects. Results: With regard to behavioral performance, patients revealed no differences in both reaction time and accuracy relative to control subjects. With regard to brain activations, direct comparison of patients with control subjects in the interference condition revealed hyperactivity in rostral anterior cingulate gyrus (rACG) and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in depressive patients, which correlated strongly with the Stroop interference. Conclusions: The study provides new evidence for the functioning and dissociation of the anterior cingulate in depressed patients. The greater prefrontal activation may reflect a cortical inefficiency due to hyperactivity in rACG enhancing the cognitive interferences from the emotional state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available