4.7 Article

Rapid formation of gas giant planets around M dwarf stars

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 643, Issue 1, Pages 501-508

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/501522

Keywords

planetary systems; stars : low-mass, brown dwarfs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extrasolar planet surveys have begun to detect gas giant planets in orbit around M dwarf stars. While the frequency of gas giant planets around M dwarfs so far appears to be lower than that around G dwarfs, it is clearly not zero. Previous work has shown that the core accretion mechanism does not seem to be able to form gas giant planets around M dwarfs, because the time required for core formation scales with the orbital period, which lengthens for lower mass stars, resulting in failed (gas-poor) cores unless the gaseous protoplanetary disk survives for > 10 Myr. Disk instability, on the other hand, is rapid enough (similar to 10(3) yr) that it should be able to form gas giant protoplanets around even low-mass stars well before the gaseous disk disappears. A new suite of three-dimensional, radiative, gravitational hydrodynamical models is presented that calculates the evolution of initially marginally gravitationally unstable disks with masses of 0.021-0.065M(circle dot) orbiting around stars with masses of 0.1 and 0.5M(circle dot), respectively. The models show that gas giant planets are indeed likely to form by the disk instability mechanism in orbit around M dwarf stars, the opposite of the prediction for formation by the core accretion mechanism. This difference offers another observational test for discriminating between these two theoretical end members for giant planet formation. Ongoing and future extrasolar planet searches around M dwarfs by spectroscopy, microlensing, photometry, and astrometry offer the opportunity to help decide between the dominance of the two mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available