4.7 Article

Time correlated pixel-by-pixel calibration for quantification and signal quality control during solute imaging

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 263-269

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2005.09.012

Keywords

imaging; optode; ammonium; time correlated pixel-by-pixel calibration; TCPC; drift

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Analytical protocols for normalization of artifacts and signal quality control are crucial in the design of intensity-based imaging optodes. In this study, we demonstrate how the time correlated pixel-by-pixel calibration (TCPC) technique could be used to predict analytical sensitivity, limit of detection (LOD) and determination of signal variation (relative standard deviation, R.S.D.) at a pixel level throughout measurements without separate tests. In addition, LOD from the TCPC protocol was used to define the operational lifetime of the sensor. The technique was tested on a recently developed imaging ammonium optode. The predicted parameters using TCPC agreed well with the determinations of the parameters using standard analytical protocols. Predicted limit of detection was 0.7 x 10(-6) M compared to 1.3 x 10(-6) M determined through a separate LOD determination. The operational lifetime of the optode was 280 h compared to the actual value of 286 h. When exposed to a soil matrix the operational lifetime was significantly reduced to 128 h. The decrease in sensor performance was efficiently tracked by all the statistical parameters, e.g. during a total experimental period of 234 h, the analytical sensitivity changed from 3 x 10(-6) M to 14 x 10(-6) M between 125 x 10(-6) M and 250 x 10(-6) M. The technique is exemplified by a long-term (similar to 10 days) test of a recently developed ammonium fluorosensor, and high-resolution imaging of ammonium concentrations in porous media following dissolution of a fertilizer stick in soil. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available