4.6 Article

Open flow hot isostatic pressing assisted synthesis of unsupported MOS2 catalysts

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL
Volume 305, Issue 2, Pages 160-168

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2006.02.056

Keywords

unsupported catalyst synthesis; HDS; porous materials; open flow method; hot isostatic pressure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the development and application of a new technique for synthesizing highly porous unsupported catalytic materials. The new technique is called open-flow hot isostatic pressing (OFHIP) technique. In this technique, an isostatic pressure is first applied to the catalyst precursor in an open flow fashion, and then heat is applied. Under this condition, as the organic components gradually decompose and leave the material, the voids left behind are immediately filled by the gas (pressure medium) in flow. This substitution warrants the preservation as well as the uniformity of the voids/pores. The result is a very porous material with uniform pore size distribution. The general goal was to determine the optimal conditions of temperature and pressure for best catalytic activity results. Results indicated that besides temperature and pressure, the catalyst precursor had significant effects, as well. The unpromoted MoS2 samples synthesized at 300 degrees C indicate that as the synthesis pressure increased, both surface area and catalytic activity of the materials produced increased. The catalytic activity k value increased by a factor of 2 from 3 to 6 x 10(-7) Mol/g s that corresponds to increase in pressure from 100 to 800 psi (6.9 to 55.2 bar), respectively. The N-2 gas used as pressure medium resulted in highly porous materials but low activity. H-2 appeared to be the ideal gas for both pressure medium and reducing agent. Co-promoted MoS2 catalysts synthesized at 1400 psi (96.5 bar) and 300 degrees C showed catalytic activity as high as 37 mol/g s. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available