Journal
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 555, Issue -, Pages 203-232Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022112006008937
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The dynamics of buoyant water entering a rotating basin are studied using a series of laboratory experiments designed to elucidate the alongshore transport mechanisms in river plumes. Inflowing water, which is discharged perpendicular to the tank wall, is observed to form a growing anticyclonic bulge and a coastal current downstream of the bulge. Detailed simultaneous measurements of the velocity and buoyancy fields in the plume confirm that the bulge momentum is in a gradient-wind balance and the coastal current is geostrophic. The growth of the bulge and accumulation of fluid within it coincides with a reduction in coastal current transport to approximately 50 % of the inflow discharge. The bulge is characterized by a depth scale, h(,) which is proportional to the geostrophic depth, h(g), and two time-dependent horizontal length scales, y(c), the displacement of the bulge centre from the wall, and r(b), the effective radius of the bulge. These two length scales are proportional to the inertial radius, L-i, and the local Rossby radius, L-b, respectively. When r(b) >> y(c), the bulge is held tightly to the wall, and a relatively large fraction of the inflow discharge is forced into the coastal current. For plumes with y(c) approaching r(b), the bulge is further from the wall, and the coastal current flux is reduced. Once y(c)/r(b) > 0.7, the bulge separates from the wall causing flow into the coastal current to cease and the bulge to become unstable. In this state, the bulge periodically detaches from and re-attaches to the wall, resulting in pulsing transport in the coastal current. Scaling of the bulge growth 1/4 based on h(g), L-i and L-b predicts that it will increase as Ro(1/4) where Ro is the inflow Rossby number. The bulge growth, inferred from direct measurements of the coastal current transport, is proportional to Ro(0.32) and agrees with the predicted dependence within the experimental error.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available