4.5 Article

The molecular basis for tissue specificity of the oxidative phosphorylation deficiencies in patients with mutations in the mitochondrial translation factor EFG1

Journal

HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages 1835-1846

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddl106

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defects in mitochondrial translation are associated with a remarkable, but unexplained diversity of clinical phenotypes. Here we have investigated the molecular basis for tissue specificity in patients with a fatal hepatopathy due to mutations in the mitochondrial translation elongation factor EFG1. Blue-native gel electrophoresis revealed unique, tissue-specific patterns in the nature and severity of the defect. Liver was the most severely affected tissue, with less than 10% residual assembly of complexes I and IV, and a 50% decrease in complex V. Skeletal muscle showed a 50% reduction in complex I, and complexes IV and V were 20% of control. In fibroblasts, complexes I and IV were 20% of control, and there was a 40-60% reduction in complexes III and V. In contrast, except for a 50% decrease in complex IV, all complexes were near normal in heart. The severity of the defect paralleled the steady-state level of the mutant EFG1 protein, which varied from 60% of control in heart to undetectable in liver. The ratio of translation elongation factors EFTu:EFTs increased from 1:6 to 1:2 in patient heart, whereas in liver it decreased from 1:1 to 1:4. Over-expression of either EFTu or EFTs in control and patient fibroblasts produced dominant negative effects, indicating that the relative abundance of these factors is an important determinant of translation efficiency. Our results demonstrate marked differences among tissues in the organization of the mitochondrial translation system and its response to dysfunction, and explain the severe hepatopathy, but normal cardiac function in EFG1 patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available