4.6 Article

Analysis of LMP1 variants of EBV in southern Thailand: Evidence for strain-associated T-cell tropism and pathogenicity

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 119-125

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.01.018

Keywords

EBV; LMP1; T-cell diseases; Thailand

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has sequence heterogeneity. Some of the variants are associated with altered tumorigenic activity and show geographically specific localization. In Thailand, the EBV genome is frequently detected in circulating T cells of T-cell diseases. Objective: To determine the role of EBV LMP1 variation in the genesis of T-cell diseases, we focused on virus factors and analyzed EBV strains in Thailand. Study design: EBV DNA was extracted from 18 healthy individuals and 45 patients with T-cell diseases in Southern Thailand and 30 healthy individuals in Central Thailand. By using PCR-direct sequencing method, nucleotide sequences corresponding to the carboxyl terminus of the LMP1 were determined. Results: Four known strains, B95-8 prototype, China 1, China 2 and Mediterranean (Med) and two novel strains, Southeast Asia 1 (SEA 1) and Southeast Asia 2 (SEA 2) were identified. The prevalence of China 2 strain was significantly different (p=0.006) between Central and Southern Thailand. Higher prevalence (p = 0.026) of 30-bp deletion type in the Southern Thais was observed. The LMP1 Med strain was associated with the worse prognosis (p = 0.029). Among T-cell diseases patients, CD3(+)-cell oriented infection was recognized in SEA1 strain (p = 0.025). Conclusion: The distribution of EBV strains may be associated with geographic/ethnic and clinical background in the Thai population. Certain EBV strains defined by their LMP1 sequence may influence cell tropism, disease association, or disease seventy. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available