Journal
CULTURE & PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 221-229Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1354067X06064580
Keywords
development; life-span theory; metatheory; time
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article examines the models of time presented by Yamada and Kato (2006) and Rudolph (2006). Although we agree with Yamada and Kato that the subjective experience of time is not linear and homogeneous, we argue that cyclical models of time are not good models of representing normative ontogenetic development, We also critically examine Rudolph's suggestion that the experience of time is derived from a succession of discrete acts of attention and 'states of ambivalence' that interpolate between the discrete acts of attention.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available