Journal
INDOOR AIR
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 216-226Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00419.x
Keywords
airborne bacteria; airborne endotoxin; collection methods; particle size distributions
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A comparison study of novel collection methods for airborne bacteria and endotoxin was performed in an environmentally controlled chamber and in pilot-field studies. Airborne particulate matter was collected in swirling liquid impingers, air-monitoring filter cassettes, and with a micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI) to evaluate aerodynamic particle size distributions. Environmentally controlled chamber studies showed that impingers and MOUDI recovered significantly more airborne bacteria than filter cassettes, whereas collection methods for airborne endotoxin were not significantly different. In addition, total airborne bacteria and endotoxin concentrations were measured indoors and outdoors at three homes in Boulder, CO during winter and summer seasons. Indoor concentrations collected with the three different samplers were significantly different for airborne endotoxin, but not for airborne bacteria. Total airborne bacteria indoors and outdoors significantly varied with seasons. Outdoor airborne endotoxin significantly varied with season; no seasonal variation was seen for indoor airborne endotoxin. Indoor and outdoor levels were not significantly different for both airborne bacteria and endotoxin. The largest proportion of endotoxin was associated with airborne particulate matter < 1 mu m.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available