4.1 Article

Clinical features of polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia in Japan: Retrospective analysis of a nationwide survey by the Japanese Elderly Leukemia and Lymphoma Study Group

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages 443-449

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1532/IJH97.06009

Keywords

polycythemia vera; essential thrombocythemia; clinical features; nationwide survey; retrospective analysis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted the first nationwide survey to clarify the clinical features. treatment methods, and prognoses for polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). A 1-page questionnaire was mailed to members of the Japanese Elderly Leukemia and Lymphoma Study Group (JELLSG). Surveys on 647 patients (PV, 266 patients; ET, 381 patients) were returned and analyzed. Thrombotic events at diagnosis and during follow-up occurred at rates of 15.4% and 8.5%, respectively, in PV cases and 17.6% and 8.7% in ET cases. Splenomegalv was observed in only 28.8% of PV patients and 10.8% of ET patients. The leukocyte alkaline phosphatase score was elevated in only 46.2 % of PV patients. The incidences of abnormal karyotypes were less than 10% in both PV and ET cases. The rates of transformation to myelofibrosis were 2.6% in both PV and ET cases, and acute leukemia was noted in 1.1% of PV patients and 2.9% of ET patients. Prognostic factors were thrombotic history for PV and thrombotic history and age (>= 60 years) for ET The present study clearly demonstrated clinical differences between Japanese and Western patients for PV and ET. Concerning the treatment of PV and ET the study revealed considerable variation among Japanese hematologists. These results suggest the necessity of developing treatment guidelines according to risk stratification that are suitable for Japanese PV and ET patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available