4.6 Article

A phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-dependent signal transition regulates ARF1 and ARF6 during Fcγ receptor-mediated phagocytosis

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages 987-999

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040162

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI064668-02, R21 AI035950, AI64668, AI35950, R01 AI064668, R01 AI035950, R01 AI035950-13] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM145304] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fc gamma receptor ( Fc gamma R)-mediated phagocytosis of IgG-coated particles is regulated by 39-phosphoinositides ( 3'PIs) and several classes of small GTPases, including ARF6 from the ADP Ribosylation Factor subfamily. The insensitivity of phagocytosis to brefeldin A ( BFA), an inhibitor of certain ARF guanine nucleotide exchange factors ( GEFs), previously indicated that ARF1 did not participate in phagocytosis. In this study, we show that ARF1 was activated during Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis and that blocking normal ARF1 cycling inhibited phagosome closure. We examined the distributions and activation patterns of ARF6 and ARF1 during Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis using fluorescence resonance energy transfer ( FRET) stoichiometric microscopy of macrophages expressing CFP- or YFP-chimeras of ARF1, ARF6, and a GTP-ARF-binding protein domain. Both GTPases were activated by BFA-insensitive factors at sites of phagocytosis. ARF6 activation was restricted to the leading edge of the phagocytic cup, while ARF1 activation was delayed and delocalized over the phagosome. Phagocytic cups formed after inhibition of PI 3-kinase ( PI-3K) contained persistently activated ARF6 and minimally activated ARF1. This indicates that a PI-3K-dependent signal transition defines the sequence of ARF GTPase activation during phagocytosis and that ARF6 and ARF1 coordinate different functions at the forming phagosome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available