4.6 Article

Effects of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy on right-sided echocardiographic parameters in patients with, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Journal

MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages 777-782

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.4065/81.6.777

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To determine the echocardiographic changes in the heart at 3 months and 1 year after pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two adult patients who underwent PTE for CTEPH at the Mayo Clinic In Rochester, Minn, from 1997 to 2003 were included in the study. All underwent transthoracic echocardiography before surgery. Follow-up echocardiography was performed within 3 months of surgery in 28 patients and 1 year postoperatively in 17 patients. The results were compared with baseline data. RESULTS: Within 3 Months after IPTE, the right ventricular end-diastolic area decreased from 38.4 +/- 12.8 cm(2) to 32.5 +/- 10.4 cm(2) (mean difference, 5.8 +/- 10.4 cm(2); P=.02). The right ventricular end-systolic area decreased from 30.4 +/- 12.1 cm(2) to 24.1 +/- 8.6 cm(2) (mean difference, 6.3 +/- 10.1 cm(2); P=.008). The right ventricular systolic pressure decreased significantly from 92.6 +/- 22.0 mm Hg to 55.0 +/- 19.8 mm Hg (mean difference, 40.0 +/- 24.8 mm Hg; P <.001). Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) improved from a mean grade of 2.5 +/- 1.2 to 1.2 +/- 1.1 (mean difference, 1.5 +/- 1.0; P <.001). At 12 months, the right ' ventricular end-diastolic area, right ventricular end-systolic area, right ventricular systolic pressure, and TR also were significantly lower than baseline values. CONCLUSION: In patients with CTEPH who undergo PTE, echocardiographic measurements of right ventricular size, systolic pressure, and TR show significant improvement immediately after surgery, which is sustained for up to 1 year after surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available