4.7 Article

Clinical activity of abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after enzalutamide

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1802-1807

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt138

Keywords

abiraterone acetate; castration-resistant; enzalutamide; prostatic neoplasms

Categories

Funding

  1. Janssen
  2. Medivation
  3. Sanofi aventis
  4. Dendreon
  5. Active Biotech/Ipsen
  6. Imclone/Ely Lilly
  7. BMS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Abiraterone acetate and enzalutamide both improve outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Optimal sequencing for these agents and whether cross-resistance occurs is unknown. Methods: Multicentre review of patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone acetate and prednisone after progressing on enzalutamide. Primary objective was to determine abiraterone acetate response. Results: Thirty patients identified from four North American centres. At abiraterone initiation, median age was 70 years (56-84 years); 70% had ECOG performance status of 0-1; all had prior docetaxel. Median prior enzalutamide treatment duration was 41 weeks (6-95 weeks), with 70% (21 of 30) having a >= 30% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline. Median abiraterone acetate treatment duration was 13 weeks (1-52). No objective radiographic responses were observed. Median abiraterone time to progression (PSA, objective or symptomatic) was 15.4 weeks [95% confidence interval (Cl) 10.7-20.2]. Median overall survival was 50.1 weeks (95% Cl 28.3-72.0). Three patients had a >= 30% PSA decline with abiraterone. Two of these patients had PSA progression as best response with prior enzalutamide. Conclusions: In this study of patients progressing after enzalutamide, treatment with abiraterone was associated with a modest response rate and brief duration of effect. Primary progression on enzalutamide may not preclude a response to abiraterone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available