4.7 Article

Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation with gemcitabine plus cisplatin: a randomized, phase III study in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages 2043-2047

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt142

Keywords

brachytherapy; cervical cancer; chemoradiation; radical hysterectomy; randomized

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that radical hysterectomy (RH) leads to improved survival outcomes in FIGO stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer when compared with standard brachytherapy (BCT) after identical external beam chemoradiation (EBRT-CT). EBRT-CT treatment consisted of six courses of cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine at 125 mg/m(2) per week concurrent with 50.4 Gy of radiation. In the BCT arm, EBRT-CT was followed by BCT to reach a point A dose of 85 Gy, whereas in the experimental arm, a type III RH with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and para-aortic lymph node sampling (RH) was carried out within 4-6 weeks after EBRT-CT. Between May 2004 and June 2009, 211 patients were enrolled (BCT, 100 and RH, 111). At a median follow-up time of 36 months (3-80), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were similar in both the arms. PFS rates were 74.8% and 71.7% in the BCT and RH arms [HR 0.6516 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3504-1.2116)], P = 0.186. OS rates were 76.3% in the BCT versus 74.5% in the surgical arm [HR 0.6981 (95% CI 0.3106-1.3439)], P = 0.236. No differences were observed in the pattern of local and systemic failures. This study failed to demonstrate that RH after EBRT-CT is superior to standard BCT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available