4.7 Article

Regorafenib in combination with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first- or second-line treatment of colorectal cancer: results of a multicenter, phase Ib study

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1560-1567

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt056

Keywords

chemotherapy; colorectal cancer; combination therapy; regorafenib; tyrosine kinase inhibition

Categories

Funding

  1. Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany
  2. Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is commonly treated with 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, and oxaliplatin or irinotecan. The multitargeted kinase inhibitor, regorafenib, was combined with chemotherapy as first- or second-line treatment of mCRC to assess safety and pharmacokinetics (primary objectives) and tumor response (secondary objective). Patients and methods: Forty-five patients were treated every 2 weeks with 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) bolus then 2400 mg/m(2) over 46 h, folinic acid 400 mg/m(2), and either oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) or irinotecan 180 mg/m(2). On days 4-10, patients received regorafenib 160 mg orally once daily. Results: The median duration of treatment was 108 (range 2-345 days). Treatment was stopped for adverse events or death (17 patients), disease progression (11 patients), and consent withdrawal or investigator decision (11 patients). Six patients remained on regorafenib at data cutoff (two without chemotherapy). Drug-related adverse events occurred in 44 patients [grade >= 3 in 32 patients: mostly neutropenia (17 patients) and leukopenia, hand foot skin reaction, and hypophosphatemia (four patients each)]. Thirty-three patients achieved disease control (partial response or stable disease) for a median of 126 (range 42-281 days). Conclusion: Regorafenib had acceptable tolerability in combination with chemotherapy, with increased exposure of irinotecan and SN-38 but no significant effect on 5-fluorouracil or oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available