4.7 Article

Assessment of SHOX2 methylation in EBUS-TBNA specimen improves accuracy in lung cancer staging

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages 2866-2870

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt365

Keywords

lung cancer; SHOX2; DNA methylation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endobronchial ultrasound with transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a well-established method to assess mediastinal lymph nodes for lung cancer. However, a proportion of patients require further investigation, due to the low negative predictive value (NPV). The objective of this study was to determine whether the assessment of short stature homeobox 2 (SHOX2) DNA methylation level in lymph node tissue obtained by EBUS-TBNA improves the accuracy of mediastinal staging. EBUS-TBNA was carried out for suspicious lymph nodes of 154 patients. Negative or ambiguous histological results were confirmed by surgical means and clinical follow-up over 6 months. EBUS-TBNA was assessed on 80 positive and 85 negative classified lymph nodes and compared with the result of the SHOX2 DNA methylation real-time PCR analysis. Relative methylation measured by delta-delta cycle threshold (delta delta Ct) was used to classify the samples. Clinical performance of the EBUS-TBNA procedure with and without the additional SHOX2 assessment was calculated against the final classification according to the gold standard. Based on data from 105 patients, an average 80-fold increase in the SHOX2 methylation level was measured for positive compared with negative lymph nodes. SHOX2 results with a delta delta Ct value of < 6.5 indicate positive lymph nodes. Applying this molecular analysis to EBUS-TBNA cases, not diagnosed by pathologic assessment, the sensitivity of staging was improved by 17%-99%. The NPV increased from 80% to 99%. The combination of EBUS-TBNA and SHOX2 methylation level strongly improves the assessment of the nodal status by identifying additional malignant lesions and confirming benign nodes and therefore avoiding invasive follow-up procedures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available