4.3 Article

The copy-number of plasmids and other genetic elements can be determined by SYBR-Green-based quantitative real-time PCR

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages 476-487

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2005.09.007

Keywords

rolling-circle replication plasmid; quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR); Comamonas; IS1071

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we explored whether SYBR Green-based quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) could be used to determine the copy number of a plasmid and whether the method was broadly applicable to chromosomally encoded genetic elements often occurring in multiple copies, such as rRNA genes and insertion sequences (IS). Three different template sources (whole cells, total DNA, and restriction-enzyme digested total DNA) derived from the bacterium Comamonas sp. strain JS46 were analyzed by qPCR using primer-pairs targeting plasmid pJS46 and three chromosomally encoded sequences (16S rDNA, ISCsp1, and IS1071). The difference between threshold cycle values, C-T, of amplicons targeting these elements and of an amplicon targeting the single-copy reference element mnbA (chromosomally encoded) was used to establish ACT. ACT values were then used to derive copy number. For pJS46, qPCR analyses of whole cells and total DNA underestimated the copy number of pJS46 similar to 7-fold and similar to 2.5-fold, respectively, whereas copy number values derived from qPCR analyses of digested total DNA were comparable to those derived from Southern blot (SB) analyses. In contrast, for the chromosomally encoded elements, qPCR analyses of all three template sources gave copy number values that were virtually identical to or differed by similar to 2 from copy number values derived by SB analysis. These data indicate that qPCR can be used to estimate the copy number of various genetic elements but that the accuracy of qPCR-derived values is affected by the template source. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available