4.3 Article

Diagnosis of nutrient constraints in citrus orchards of humid tropical India

Journal

JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 1061-1076

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01904160600689183

Keywords

citrus; constraints; northeast India; nutrient diagnostics; leaf analysis; soil analysis; optimum yield

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Citrus growing in humid, tropical India is concentrated in east to northeast India. The region is well known for large-scale commercial cultivation of Citrus reticulata Blanco, cultivar 'Khasi,' mandarin. Extensive surveys were conducted covering as many as 108 orchards from 52 locations representing eight states, namely West Bengal, Sikkim, Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, and Manipur. Expressed in milligrams per kilogram, the optimum values for available nutrients in soil were determined to be as: nitrogen (N) (220.8-240.6), phosphorus (P) (21.2-45.6), potassium (K) (252.2-300.8), calcium (Ca) (278.1-318.6), magnesium (Mg) (67.2-92.5), iron (Fe) (82.2-114.6), manganese (Mn) (21.4-32.8), copper (Cu) (0.82-2.62), and zinc (Zn) (2.18-4.22) using multivariate quadratic regression analysis. The corresponding leaf-nutrient values, expressed in percent, were: N (2.23-2.49), P (0.10-0.11), K (1.86-2.12), Ca (2.12-2.32), and Mg (0.28-0.38), and in ppm were Fe (148.2-179.8), Mn (72.2-84.8), Cu (10.4-18.6), and Zn (24.2-38.8). These reference values of soil and leaf analysis were later observed to be well within the range of values obtained for high-performance orchards (45-62 kg tree(-1)), confirming the hypothesis that soil fertility and leaf nutrient levels maintained under high yielding orchards could be used provisionally as nutrient diagnostics. Nutrient constraints in the form of N, P, Ca, Mg, Cu, and Zn were identified using these diagnostics, which deserve a place in a fertilizer program of mandarin orchards of the region to obtain sustainable optimum fruit yield.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available