4.3 Article

High KIR diversity in Amerindians is maintained using few gene-content haplotypes

Journal

IMMUNOGENETICS
Volume 58, Issue 5-6, Pages 474-480

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00251-006-0108-3

Keywords

KIR haplotypes; KIR locus genotypes; Amerindians; balancing selection

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI017892, R01 AI017892] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interaction between killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and cognate HLA class I ligands influences the innate and adaptive immune response to infection. The KIR family varies in gene content and allelic polymorphism, thereby, distinguishing individuals and populations. KIR gene content was determined for 230 individuals from three Amerindian tribes from Venezuela: the Yucpa, Bari and Warao. Gene-content haplotypes could be assigned to 212 individuals (92%) because only five different haplotypes were present-group A and four group B. Six different haplotype combinations accounted for > 80% of individuals. Each tribe has distinctive genotype frequencies. Despite few haplotypes, all 14 KIR genes are at high frequency in the three tribes, with the exception of 2DS3. Each population has an even frequency of group A and B haplotypes. Allele-level analysis of 3DL1/S1 distinguished five group A haplotypes and six group B haplotypes. The high frequency and divergence of the KIR haplotypes in the Amerindian tribes provide greater KIR diversity than is present in many larger populations. An extreme case being the Yucpa, for whom two gene-content haplotypes account for > 90% of the population. These comprise the group A haplotype and a group B haplotype containing all the KIR genes, except 2DS3, that typify the group B haplotypes. Here is clear evidence for balancing selection on the KIR system and the biological importance of both A and B haplotypes for the survival of human populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available