4.8 Article

Estrogens maintain bile duct mass and reduce apoptosis after biliodigestive anastomosis in bile duct ligated rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1158-1166

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.032

Keywords

cholangiocyte; proliferation; cholestasis

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 58411, DK 06 2975] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Disapperacence of bile ducts (ductopenia) represents the terminal, common stage of human cholangiopathies, and estrogens exert a major role in stimulating cholangiocyte proliferation. We thus evaluated whether estrogen administration protect from the bile duct loss induced by the biliary-digestive diversion in bile duct ligated (BDL) rats. Methods: After 3 weeks of BDL, rats were subjected to biliary-digestive diversion and treated with daily injections of 17 beta-estradiol or a control solution. Results: Both after 7 and 14 days from the biliary-digestive diversion a marked increase of the number of apoptotic cholangiocytes was observed. In contrast, 17 beta-estradiol significantly reduced cholangiocyte apoptosis. 17 beta-estradiol also prevented the biliary-digestive diversion-induced loss of PCNA-positive cholangiocytes and of the bile duct mass. Biliary-digestive diversion determined a marked reduction of ERK1/2 phopsphorylation in cholangiocytes that was reversed by the administration of 17 beta-estradiol. Conclusions: This study indicates that estrogens prevent the increase of cholangiocyte apoptosis and loss of cholangiocyte proliferation induced by the biliary-digestive diversion in the BDL rat. In parallel, 17 beta-estradiol also enhanced ERK1/2 phosphorylation, which is instead strongly reduced by the biliary-digestive diversion. These novel findings suggest that estrogens could prevent the evolution of cholangiopathies toward ductopenia. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of the European Association for the Study of the Liver.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available